Mumbai, May 4, 2024 – Vijay Jitlal Giri’s bail application has been rejected by the Sessions Court for Greater Bombay in a robbery case. Additional Sessions Judge Dr. A. A. Joglekar (Court Room No. 37) issued the order on May 2, 2024.
Giri was arrested in connection with C.R. No. 187 of 2024, registered at the Wadala T.T. Police Station, for offenses under Section 392 (robbery) of the Indian Penal Code (IPC).
Background and Allegations:
The prosecution alleged that on March 21, 2024, at around 9:30 p.m., Giri approached the complainant and demanded money. When she refused, he threatened her with a knife and forcibly took Rs. 2,000 from her purse. Nearby residents apprehended Giri and handed him over to the police.
Arguments Presented:
- Applicant’s Argument (Giri):
- He is falsely implicated.
- A co-accused was granted bail, and he claims parity.
- The alleged weapon was not seized by the police.
- Further incarceration is unnecessary.
- Prosecution’s Argument:
- There are eyewitnesses to the incident.
- The investigation is ongoing.
- Giri has 10 prior criminal antecedents.
- The knife and the stolen Rs. 2,000 were recovered during a personal search of Giri.
- There is a risk of Giri absconding, tampering with evidence, and threatening witnesses.
Court’s Reasoning and Decision:
Judge Joglekar considered the arguments and the evidence. The court noted:
- Giri did not deny his presence at the scene.
- He was apprehended by a mob at the scene and handed over to the police.
- There are eyewitnesses who reside near Giri.
- Giri has a significant criminal record.
- The knife and the stolen money were recovered from him.
- There is a risk of Giri tampering with evidence, as the victim and witnesses live nearby.
- The court found that a prima facie case exists against Giri.
- Based on these facts, the court determined that Giri’s bail application should be rejected.
Order Details:
The order was dictated on May 2, 2024, transcribed on May 3, 2024, and signed on May 4, 2024. The certified copy was uploaded on May 4, 2024, at 12:16 p.m.
This decision reflects the court’s consideration of Giri’s criminal record, the recovery of evidence from him, the presence of eyewitnesses, and the risk of witness tampering and absconding.