1 ITEM NO.38 COURT NO.11 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s).12143/2022
(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 01-11-2022 in CRMBA No.29646/2022 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad)
POONAM Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ANR. Respondent(s)
(FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.194974/2022-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.194973/2022-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.)
Date : 03-01-2023 This petition was called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE J.K. MAHESHWARI
For Petitioner(s) Mr. Vikash Chandra Shukla , AOR
Mr. V. C. Shukla, Adv.
Mr. Tarun Gulia, Adv.
Mr. Nitesh Ranjan, Adv.
Mr. Piyush Singh, Adv.
Mr. Ajay Awasthi, Adv.
Mr. Manish Dutt Sharma, Adv.
Mr. Pushpraj Singh Parihar, Adv.
For Respondent(s)
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
O R D E R
1. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and on carefully perusing the material placed on record, we are not inclined to interfere with the impugned order of bail dated 01.11.2022, passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, at this stage.
2. It goes without saying that in case respondent No.2 or any other accused, who has been enlarged on bail, is found misusing the concession of bail granted by the High Court, the petitioner 2 has an effective alternative remedy to approach the appropriate Court under Section 439(2) Cr.P.C. for cancellation of bail.
3. With the aforesaid liberty, the Special Leave Petition stands disposed of.
4. As a result, pending interlocutory applications also stand disposed of.
(SATISH KUMAR YADAV) (PREETHI T.C.)
DEPUTY REGISTRAR COURT MASTER (NSH)