1 ITEM NO.16 COURT NO.9 SECTION II-A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s).3963/2021
(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 07-04-2021 in ABA No.1016/2021 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay)
NITESH GOPI PARAMEL Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA Respondent(s)
IA No.64544/2021 – EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED
JUDGMENT
IA No.64545/2021 – EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.
IA No.65787/2021 – PERMISSION TO PLACE ADDITIONAL FACTS AND GROUNDS
Date : 10-01-2023 This matter was called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN
For Petitioner(s) Mr. G. Balaji, AOR
For Respondent(s) Mr. Aniruddha Joshi, Adv.
Mr. Siddharth Dharmadhikari, Adv.
Mr. Aaditya Aniruddha Pande, AOR
Mr. Bharat Bagla, Adv.
Ms. Kirti Dadheech, Adv.
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
O R D E R
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties at a considerab length and carefully perused the material placed on record.
2. Keeping in view the contents of the FIR as also the gravity and seriousness of the allegations levelled against the petitioner, we are not inclined to grant pre-arrest bail to him.
3. The Special Leave Petition is, accordingly, dismissed.
4. Consequently, order dated 04.06.2021, granting interim protection to the petitioner, stands vacated.
5. However, this order shall not be taken as an expression of opinion on the merits of the case. 2
6. As a result, pending interlocutory applications also stands disposed of.
(SATISH KUMAR YADAV) (KAMLESH RAWAT)
DEPUTY REGISTRAR COURT MASTER