1 ITEM NO.12 COURT NO.2 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 10116/2022
(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 13-10-2022 in CRLP No. 5493/2022 passed by the High Court Of Andhra Pradesh At Amravati)
KOTTEVALLA JAYAPRAKSAH REDDY Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH & ANR. Respondent(s)
([PERSONAL PRESENCE OF THE HOME SECRETARY VIRTUALLY IN THIS
COURT] WITH
Diary No(s). 40577/2022 (II)
(FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA 6075/2023 FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA 6078/2023
SLP(Crl) No. 10453/2022 (II)
Date : 31-01-2023 These petitions were called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY S. OKA
For Petitioner(s) Mr. Dama Seshadri Naidu, Sr. Adv.
Mr. Pai Amit, AOR
Ms. Ranu Purohit, Adv.
Ms. Pankhuri Bhardwaj, Adv.
Ms. Bhavana Duhoon, Adv.
Mr. Abhiyudaya Vats, Adv.
Mr. Siddharth Chapalgaonkar, Adv.
Mr. Ananway Anandvardhan, Adv.
Mr. Poornachandiran R., Adv.
Mr. Hitesh Singh, Adv.
Mr. Gursimar Preet Singh, Adv.
Ms. Sivani Kakumanu, Adv.
Mr. K. Sai Teja, Adv.
Ms. Sonali Suryawanshi, Adv.
Mr. Tarun Gupta, AOR
Mr. Sathyanarayanan Meenakshisundaram, Sr. Adv.
Mr. Yelamanchili Shiva Santosh Kumar, Adv.
For Respondent(s) Mr. Dama Seshadri Naidu, Sr. Adv.
Mr. Pai Amit, AOR
Mr. Mahfooz Ahsan Nazki, AOR
Mr. Polanki Gowtham, Adv.
Mr. K V Girish Chowdary, Adv.
Mr. Shaik Mohamad Haneef, Adv.
Ms. Ms. Niti Richhariya, Adv.
Ms. Rajeswari Mukherjee, Adv.
Mr. T Vijaya Bhaskar Reddy, Adv.
Ms. Niti Richhariya, Adv.
Mr. Tarun Gupta, AOR
Mr. Sathyanarayanan Meenakshisundaram, Sr. Adv.
Mr. Yelamanchili Shiva Santosh Kumar, Adv.
Mr. Yatinder Chaudhary, Adv.
Mr. Davinder Singh Khurana, Adv.
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
O R D E R
It is most unfortunate that only the direction for the personal presence of the Principal Secretary has resulted in finally the Public Prosecutor to be appointed possibly within a day of the order being issued.
We have put to learned Principal Secretary that the credibility of the State Department to carry out the prosecution has been put in doubt by their own conduct. He assures the Court that all steps would be taken for day to day trial as far as possible. We would like to see this translate into action and thus, consider appropriate to defer consideration in this matter till the next date.

Learned counsel for the complainant pointed out that on three occasions time schedule was fixed bu the said time schedule was de-railed because one or the other of the accused was not present. We thus, direct that all accused shall remain present on all dates otherwise we will be constrained to cancel the bail of those accused and the said accused be put to notice of this fact.
List on 10.04.2023.

(ASHA SUNDRIYAL) (POONAM VAID)
ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS COURT MASTER (NSH)