KAMAL @ KAMLESH JAYKISHAN CHANDVANI VERSUS JAIL SUPERINTENDENT Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 538/2023

ITEM NO.7 COURT NO.14 SECTION II-B S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 538/2023
(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 02-01-2023 in CRLMA No. 2/2022 passed by the High Court Of Gujarat At Ahmedabad)
KAMAL @ KAMLESH JAYKISHAN CHANDVANI Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
JAIL SUPERINTENDENT Respondent(s)
IA No. 7604/2023 – EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT
IA No. 7607/2023 – EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.) WITH
SLP(Crl) No. 909/2023 (II-B)
(FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.12924/2023-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.12925/2023-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.)
SLP(Crl) No. 713/2023 (II-B)
( IA No.10404/2023-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.10405/2023-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.)
Date : 30-01-2023 These matters were called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DIPANKAR DATTA
For Petitioner(s) Mr. Varinder Kumar Sharma, AOR
Ms. Parul Sharma, Adv.
Mr. Shantanu Sharma, Adv.
Mr. Bishan Dass, Adv.
Mr. Bikash Chandra, Adv.
For Respondent(s)
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
O R D E R
During the hearing learned counsel submitted that the petitioner would apply for regular bail. In such event, the same 1 would be considered on its merits uninfluenced by the order in the present case. This Court is of the opinion that no case is made out for extension of interim bail.
The special leave petition is dismissed in terms of the above observations.
Pending application(s), if any, are disposed of.
(HARSHITA UPPAL) (MATHEW ABRAHAM)
SENIOR PERSONAL ASSISTANT COURT MASTER (NSH)
2

Leave a Comment