ITEM NOS.22+41 COURT NO.2 SECTION PIL-W
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Writ Petition (Criminal) No. 59/2024
BADRUNNOSA RIYAZUDDING KADRI & ANR. Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
UNION OF INDIA & ANR. Respondent(s)
(FOR ADMISSION and IA No.28356/2024-GRANT OF INTERIM RELIEF) WITH W.P. (Crl.) No. 73/2024 (FOR ADMISSION and IA No.33448/2024-INTERIM BAIL) W.P.(Crl.) No. 65/2024 (X) (FOR ADMISSION and IA No.30104/2024-EX-PARTE STAY) W.P.(Crl.) No. 68/2024 (X) (FOR ADMISSION and IA No.31551/2024-GRANT OF INTERIM RELIEF)
Date : 09-02-2024 This matter was called on for hearing today.
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DIPANKAR DATTA
For Petitioner(s) Mr. Nishant Bishnoi, AOR
Ms. Srishti Prabhakar, Adv.
Mr. Raj Kishor Choudhary, AOR
Mr. Harsh Sethi, Adv.
Mr. Shakeel Ahmed, Adv.
Ms. Pratibha Singh, Adv.
Ms. Shivika Mehra, Adv.
Mr. Anant Nigam, Adv.
Mr. Pratham Sagar, Adv.
Mr. Ankur Garg, Adv.
Mr. Raghav Luthra, Adv.
Mr. Anupam Bhati, Adv.
Mr. Amir Kaleem, Adv.
Mr. Nakul Chaudhary, Adv.

Mr. Siddhartha Dave, Sr. Adv.
Mr. Shrey Lodha, Adv.
Mr. Akshat Vachher, Adv.
Ms. Abhiti Vachher, Adv.
Mr. Parvesh Bansal, Adv.
Mr. Rahul Bansal, Adv.
M/s. Vachher And Agrud, AOR
For Respondent(s)
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
O R D E R
W.P.(Crl.) Nos. 59/2024, 73/2024 and 68/2024
Issue notice and tag with Writ Petition (Criminal) no. 212/2019 titled � Gaj Raj Singh Baid vs. Union of India & Anr. and other connected writ petitions. Interim order passed on 09.08.2019 in Writ Petition (Criminal) no. 212/2019 will operate and apply.
The petitioners, however, will join and cooperate in the investigation.
Subject to orders of Honble the Chief Justice, the connected writ petitions, including the present ones, may be listed at an early date before an appropriate Bench.

Learned Senior Advocate appearing for the petitioner(s) seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition and states that the petitioner(s), if advised, may file a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the jurisdictional High Court.
In view of the statement made, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
We clarify that we have not made any comments on merits.
(DEEPAK GUGLANI) (R.S. NARAYANAN)
AR-cum-PS ASSISTANT REGISTRAR