ITEM NO.28 COURT NO.9 SECTION II-A
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s).275-276/2023 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 07-10-2022 in ABA No.2665/2022 and order sated 14-11-2022 in ABA No.2665/2022 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay)
AMRITA SANTOSH SHETTY Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANR. Respondent(s)
(IA No.3885/2023-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.3886/2023-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.)
Date : 16-01-2023 These petitions were called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE J.K. MAHESHWARI For Petitioner(s)
Mr. Anand S.Jondhale, Adv.
Ms. Sunita Verma, Adv.
Mr. Sanjay Malik, Adv.
Mr. Jugul Kishor Gupta, AOR For Respondent(s)
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
O R D E R
1. We have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and carefully perused the material placed on record.
2. In our considered view, no case to interfere with the impugned orders dated 07.10.2022 and 14.11.2022, passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, granting anticipatory bail to respondent No.2 and making it absolute, is made out.
3. The Special Leave Petitions are, accordingly, dismissed.
4. It is, however, clarified that the impugned orders will not cause any impediment in the ongoing investigation, which shall be taken to its logical conclusion.
5. As a result, pending interlocutory applications also
stand disposed of.
(SATISH KUMAR YADAV) (PREETHI T.C.)
DEPUTY REGISTRAR COURT MASTER (NSH)