CNR No. MHNS010018732022
Order below Exh.1 in Cri. Bail Application No.489 /2022

( Applicant/accused Anil Ramesh More Vs. State )

This is application for bail u/s. 439 of the Cr.P.C. in C.R. No.98 of 2022 registered with Mumbai Naka Police Station, Nashik u/ss. 304 r/w.34 of The Indian Penal Code(IPC).

2. The learned counsel Mr.A.K. Kale for the applicant submits that, applicant is innocent person and he has been falsely implicated. Applicant is ready to abide by any of the terms and conditions to be imposed by this Court. Applicant was arrested on 11.04.2022, and at present he is remanded in judicial custody. Nothing has been recovered from the the applicant during investigation. He has got fix and permanent place of residence and undertakes to cooperate investigation.

3. Learned APP Mr. R.M. Baghdane, by filing pursis (Exh.­ 5) adopted say (Exh.4) filed by Investigation officer (I.O.) and strongly objected this application.

4.It is the case of prosecution that, informant Surekha Sachin @ Shashi Patil lodged missing case No. 16/2022 in respect of missing of her husband deceased Sachin aged 36 years and relatives of Renuka More also lodged missing case No. 13/2022 in respect of Renuka. Thereafter, relatives of Renuka More brought deceased Sachin and Renuka who had run away with him from Surat. Applicant and his other relatives got annoyed and beat her husband deceased Sachin by means of wooden logs, fist and kick
blows. He was brought to the Civil Hospital for treatment wherein he succumbed to the injuries.

5.Perusal of record reveals that, the accused is directly involved in the commission of offence. Even though, he is not named in the FIR but there is sufficient material against him. Deceased succumbed to the injuries, due beating by the applicant and his two sons accused Siddhartha More and Akshaya More and other persons by weapon i. e. Wooden log, stick and fist and kick blows, as her daughter Renuka had run away with the deceased at Surat. Offence is serious and investigation is incomplete. Custodial interrogation is necessary for thorough investigation. He may hamper or tamper prosecution witnesses or evidence. I do not find any merits in this application. Consequently, I am not inclined to exercise my discretion in favour of the applicant. Hence, the order.

ORDER

This application stands rejected.

Date : 25.04. 2022. ( S.T. Tripathi) Additional Sessions Judge­ 7, Nashik.