Order below Exh. 1 in Cri. Bail Application No. 303/2022 CNR No. MHNS0100097322022
( Aniket Kiran Shiledar Vs. State )
Perused application. The applicant and his learned Counsel remained absent when this application was taken up for perusal.
2.By this third bail application, the applicant seeks prearrest bail under section 438 of the Cr.P.C. from being arrested in Crime No.57/2020 registered with Upnagar Police Station, Nashik under sections 420, 406, 468, 504, 506 r/w.34 of the Indian Penal Code.
3.On going through the record, it is conscious that already two bail applications under section 438 of Cr.P.C. vide Criminal Bail Application nos. 240/2020 and 1367/2021 of duo accused inclusive present one came to be rejected on merits wherein all the grounds complained of were already dealt with by me and my brother Judge.
4.It is well settled that, the successive bail application, on the same facts under section 438 is not tenable. However, unnecessarily, the applicant has abused the process.
5.In view of above, I see application is devoid of merits. Hence, order :
ORDER
Application is rejected with directions to applicant to pay compensatory costs of Rs.2000/ (Two thousands) to be deposited with DLSA Office, Nashik.
Digitally signed by VIKAS VIKAS SHIVRUPRAO SHIVRUPRAO KULKARNI KULKARNI Date: 2022.03.07 16:03:32 +0530 ( Vikas S. Kulkarni ) March 7, 2022. Additional Sessions Judge, Nashik.