Uday Gajendra Chavan and Ors Vs State of Maharashtra Nashik Sessions Court BA 514 of 2022

..1..

Order Below Exh. 1 in Cri. B. Appln. No. 514/2022
CNR No.MHNS010020272022
Uday Gajendra Chavan & 7 others Vs. State.
Heard:
1.

Ld. Adv. Mr. A. S. Sanap for the applicants.

This is an application under section 438 of the Code of
Criminal Procedure since the applicants apprehend arrest in an
offence (under section 498­A, 406, 323, 504 & 506 r.w. Sec. 34 of
the Indian Penal Code, 1860) which may get registered against them
at Ambad Police Station, Nashik by the complainant Chaitanya
Dhirendra Garud @ Chaidtanya Uday Chavan.
2.

Learned Advocate for the applicants has submitted that
the above complainant has filed a complaint at Ambad Police Station,
Nashik alleging commission of the above offence against the
applicants. However, the FIR is not yet registered. Applicants are
ready to abide by the terms and conditions imposed by the Court and
also co­operate with the investigating agency. Custodial interrogation
of the applicants is not necessary.
3.

FIR is not yet registered. Offence appears to be primarily
under Sec. 498­A of the I.P.C. In view thereof, I am inclined to allow
the application in terms of the following order.

..2..

:ORDER:
1]
Application is hereby partly allowed.

2]
Ambad Police Station, Nashik is directed to give 72
hours prior notice to arrest the applicants
Uday Gajendra Chavan, Gajendra Kautik Chavan,
Pushpa Gajendra Chavan, Shraddha Chetan Patil,
Chetan Bapurao Patil, Rajesh Sukhalal Patil, Savita
Rajesh Patil, Purva Rajesh Patil in case an offence
against them is registered at the instance of the
complainant Chaitanya Dhirendra Garud @ Chaidtanya
Uday Chavan under Sections 498­A, 406, 323, 504 &
506 r./w. Sec. 34 of the I.P.C.

3]
Application is disposed of accordingly.
MRIDULA
BHATIA
Nashik
26/04/2022
Digitally
signed by
MRIDULA
BHATIA
Date:
2022.04.26
11:55:19
+0530
Mridula Bhatia
District Judge­2 & Additional
Sessions Judge, Nashik.

Leave a Comment