1
Cri. Bail Application No. 818 of 2022
ORDER BELOW EX. 01 IN CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION
NO. 818 OF 2022
{Siddhant @ Golu Jagdish Gaikwad vs. The State of Maharashtra
through Ambad Police Station}
This is the bail application under section 439 of the
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 filed by the applicant-accused in
crime No. 262 of 2022 registered with Ambad Police Station for the
offence punishable under section 302 read with 34 of the I. P. C.
02]
The applicant contended that false and fabricated case is
registered against him. He has no concerned with the crime. He is
innocent and not done any offence. He is arrested on suspicion. He is
permanent resident of Chalisgaon, Tq. Chalisgaon, Dist. Jalgaon. His
family is dependent on him. Nothing has been seized from the
applicant. He is in jail from 14.06.2022. He has no criminal
antecedent. He will cooperate the investigation machinery. Nothing
remained to be investigated from him. He is ready to abide by any
conditions imposed by the court. He has prayed for grant of bail.
03]
learned APP has filed say at Ex. 05 and I. O. has also
filed say at Ex. 06. They have stated that the offence is of serious
nature. The accused Piyush formed conspiracy with two juveniles in
conflict with law and the present accused. The crime has been
committed with cold blooded mind and with the weapon i.e. knife
and sword. The accused has used juveniles to commit the crime. One
of the juvenile got injured and the present accused wrapped on the
injury of him by his shirt. All the accused while running away were
seen in five different CCTV footages. T.I.P. is to be done. There is
strong evidence against them. If the accused is released on bail, he
will threat the prosecution witnesses. Hence, he has prayed for
rejection of bail.

2
04]
Heard the learned counsel for accused and learned APP.

They have argued as per their stand taken.
05]
I
have
gone
through
application,
say,
arguments,
documents, police papers. There is strong prima-facie case against the
accused. The act of the accused is preplanned and committed with cold
blooded mind. There is direct evidence against the accused in the nature
of CCTV footages of five different places. The offence is brutal murder
and punishment is severe. The investigation is going on. At this stage,
the role of the accused can not be segregated. Yet, the T. I. P. is to be
done. Though, the accused has no criminal antecedent and is aged 21
years, are not the ground to grant him a bail looking to the above
reasoning. Bail to the accused is not warranted. Hence, the following
order:
ORDER
Application is rejected.
RATHI
ROOPESH
RAMSWARUP
Date : 06.07.2022
Digitally signed by
RATHI ROOPESH
RAMSWARUP
Date: 2022.07.07
17:30:46 +0530
(R. R. Rathi)
Additional Sessions Judge-6,
Nashik.