Ramdas Chandu Shinde Ram Vs State of Maharashtra Nashik Sessions Court Bail Application Section 302 IPC

1 Criminal Bail Application No. 1192 of 2022
ORDER BELOW EX. 01 IN CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1192 OF 2022

(Ramdas Chandu Shinde @ Ram (Accused no. 3) vs. The State of Maharashtra through Upnagar Police Station)

This is the third bail application after filing charge sheet under section 439 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 filed by the applicant-accused in crime No. 18 of 2022 registered with Upnagar Police Station, Nashik for the offences punishable under sections 302, 326, 323 read with 34 of the I. P. C., sections 129/194(D), 128(1)/194(C), 3(1)/181 of the Maharashtra Motor Vehicle Act and
section 50/177 of the Central Motor Vehicle Act.

02] On merits of the case, the applicant is seeking bail. Those grounds are not reproduced as they were already raised in previous bail applications. There is no evidence against him. He is in Jail from 24.01.2022. He is ready to abide by any conditions imposed by the court. He has prayed for grant of bail.

03] APP has filed say at Ex. 05 and and I. O. filed say at Ex. 06. They have stated that the offence is of serious nature. On merits, they opposed the bail application and have stated that the earlier bail applications were rejected on merits and there is no change in circumstances. They have prayed for rejection of the bail.

04] Heard the learned counsel for the accused, learned APP. They have argued as per their stand taken as above.

05] I have gone through application, say, arguments, police papers and the documents. Already after filing charge sheet, my predecessor has rejected the bail application of the accused vide order in
criminal bail application no. 561 of 2022 dtd. 07.06.2022 on merits of the case. Also, thereafter, I have also rejected bail of the present accused on the ground of change in circumstance vide order below Ex. 15 in Session Case No. 314 of 2022.

06] I have read the entire application of the accused. Already, after filing charge sheet, his two bail applications as above are rejected. Utterly, there are no change in circumstances to file the bail
application. The accused is misusing his right to file bail applications.

Even though, his bail applications are rejected. The accused is wasting the time of the court.

07] There is strong prima-facie case against him and eye witnesses are against him. The offence is of murder and accused played vital role in it. The grounds mentioned in application can be considered on merits of the case and there is no change in circumstance to file third bail application after filing of the charge sheet. The accused is in custody from January, 2022 and the court is ready to expedite the matter, if accused is ready to face the trial.

Application is devoid of merits. Hence, the following order:
O R D E R

01] Application is rejected.

02] The accused is warned to not to make frivolous bail application without substantial change in
circumstances of the case.

Digitally signed by RATHI RATHI ROOPESH ROOPESH RAMSWARUP RAMSWARUP Date: 2022.10.04
17:24:07 +0530 Date : 01.10.2022 (R. R. Rathi) Additional Sessions Judge-6, Nashik.

Leave a Comment