1
Cri.BailAppln.No.690/22­Ex.1
Order below Exh.1 in Cri. Bail Application No.690/ 2022
Milind Prakash Dahite
.. Applicant
Accused.

Vs.

The State of Maharashtra
through PI Satpur Police St.
(Cr. No. I 122/2022)
.. Respondent.

Order below Exh. 1
1.

The
applicant/accused Milind Prakash Dahite
claims bail in C.R. No. I­122/2022 for the offences punishable
under Sections 306, 304­B, 498­A, 504 r/w. 34 of the Indian Penal
Code registered with Satpur Police Station.

2.

Heard Learned Advocate Shri R.D.Avhad, for the
applicant and learned A.P.P. Smt. Sangale for the State and
ld.Adv. Shri Tidke for the complainant­intervenor.
present. Perused the papers of investigation.

IO is also
2
3.

Cri.BailAppln.No.690/22­Ex.1
It is the case of the prosecution that the applicant has
harassed the deceased for unlawful demand to such an extent
that she was left with no other option but to commit suicide and
accordingly, accused­applicant abated the commission of suicide
by the deceased.
4.

The ld. Advocate for the applicant submitted that
there is delay of 15 hours to lodge report after the incident.
Applicant has no direct concern with the alleged offence. He has
not instigated or abated the commission of suicide.
any recovery from the applicant.

There is no
Applicant has produced
documents on record to show that the applicant and his family
were happy on the occasion of birth of the daughter/girl child. So
also, other documents i.e. copy of agreement of sell for purchase
of flat is produced on record.

Bank pass­book of the applicant
and his parents, RD book of the deceased and house document
etc. are produced on record to show that applicant’s family is
financially sound and there is no question of unlawful demand.
Applicant has been falsely implicated. Therefore, ld. Advocate for
the applicant submitted that applicant be released on bail.
5.

Per contra, ld. APP resisted the application with the
contention that the offence committed by the applicant is very
much serious in nature.

Prima facie concern of the applicant
with the alleged offence is clear.

Investigation is not yet
complete. Therefore, ld. APP requested to reject the application.

3
Cri.BailAppln.No.690/22­Ex.1
Intervenor has also produced application to object the bail and
medical treatment papers of the deceased when she was
previously admitted with the history of head­injury.
6.

I have perused the application and papers of
investigation.

There are specific averment in the report that
informant who is the father of the deceased, was aware about the
harassment at the hands of applicant to the deceased.

He has
attempted to convince the applicant and his family from time to
time. It reveals from the averment in the report that there was
consistent harassment to the deceased for unlawful demand.
There are further allegations that one year before, applicant has
assaulted the deceased, strangulated her and thereby she
sustained head­injury.

Medical papers to that effect are
produced on record by the intervenor. Thus, prima facie concern
of the applicant with the alleged offence, is clear. Deceased had
committed suicide by hanging herself at her matrimonial house.
Apparently, it is suicidal death within three years of marriage
and after three months of the birth of daughter.

7.

In
this
matter,
investigation
is
in
progress.

Considering the accusation and nature of offence thereof, it is
apparent that thorough investigation is required to be done. If
the applicant would be released on bail, he may pressurize the
witnesses
and
tamper
with
the
prosecution
evidence.

4
Cri.BailAppln.No.690/22­Ex.1
Considering all these aspects, this Court is of the view that the
applicant is not entitled for grant of bail. Hence, the order.

Order
1/­
Application (Exh.1) stands rejected.

2/­
Informed Investigating Officer accordingly.
ADITEE
UDAY
KADAM
Nashik.
Date : 13.06.2022.

Digitally
signed by
ADITEE
UDAY
KADAM
Date:
2022.06.13
17:17:44 0600
(Aditee U. Kadam)
Additional Sessions Judge­2,
Nashik.