CNR MHNS0100462212020 Order below Exh.1 in Cri. Bail Application No.1691/2020.

{Ganesh Kantilal Shilvane Vs. State }

This is an application under section 439 of the Criminal Procedure Code for grant of bail pending trial.

2.Brief facts giving rise to this application can be narrated as follows.

The applicant came to be arrested on 30/11/2020 in Crime No. 298/2020 for the offence punishable under sections 354, 354­A of the Indian Penal Code registered with Sarkarwada Police Station, Nashik on the accusation that on 29/11/2020, at about 10.15 p.m. at Ghankar Lane, Raviwar Karanja, Nashik the applicant accused outraged the modesty of informant and thereby committed an offence.

3.The applicant contends that he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. There is nothing on record to show his involvement in the commission of offence. He is behind bar from the date of his arrest. Investigation is almost completed.

Nothing is to be recovered or discovered from him. Therefore, his further detention is not necessary for the purpose of investigation.

He is having permanent place of abode and roots in the society. He is ready to furnish the surety to the satisfaction of this Court and also ready to abide by the conditions, if any, imposed by this Court. On these lines, he has prayed for bail pending trial.

4.The respondent State filed its reply and inter­alia denied all the adverse allegations made by the applicant and reiterated prosecution case. There is prima­facie sufficient material on record to show the involvement of the applicant in the commission of the offence. If the accused is released on bail, he may hamper or tamper with the prosecution witnesses. On these lines, respondent State has prayed for rejection of the bail petition.

5.Heard learned advocate Mr. Mahajan appearing on behalf of the applicant and learned A.P.P. Smt. Sangale. I have also perused the investigation papers made available by the Investigating Officer. Offence is exclusively tribale by Court of Magistrate. The statement of informant u/s 164 of Cr.P.C. is already recorded and her clothes are already seized. Nothing is to be recovered or discovered at the instance of applicant­accused. There is no reason to believe that he has committed an offence punishable with death or life imprisonment. The applicant is behind the bar from the date of his arrest. He is ready to co­operate in further investigation and to furnish sufficient surety. He is also ready to abide by the conditions, if any, imposed by this court. No useful purpose will suffice by keeping him behind bar till filing of the charge­sheet or conclusion of the trial, when he is ready to furnish surety and ready to abide by the conditions. Considering the aforesaid facts, I am of the opinion that the applicant has made out case for grant of bail on certain terms and conditions. With this, I proceed to pass the following order.

O R D E R
1 Application is hereby allowed.

2 Applicant Ganesh Kantilal Shilvane be enlarged on bail, in Crime No. 298/2020 for the offence punishable under sections 354,354­A of the Indian Penal Code registered with Sarkarwada Police Station, Nashik, on furnishing personal bond of Rs.15,000/­ with surety in like amount.

3 He shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as dissuade them for disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer.

4 He shall not commit similar or any other offence and misuse the liberty granted by this Court.

5 He shall furnish his address proof, identification proof and mobile number, if any, and shall not change his residential address without informing Investigating Officer.

( Smt. S.C. Jadhav ) 6th January, 2021. Additional Sessions Judge ­8, Nashik.