Sudhakar Vitthal Narvekar Vs State of Maharashtra Bombay Sessions Court Criminal Bail Application No 377 of 2024

MHCC020027272024
IN THE COURT OF SESSIONS FOR GREATER MUMBAI,
AT MAZGAON
CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO.377 OF 2024
IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.95 OF 2024
Sudhakar Vitthal Narvekar,
Age : 61 years, Occ. : –,
Residing at : Jacob Apartments, 3rd Floor,
Room No.303, Opp. Samruddhi Society,
Dadar (W), Mumbai ­ 400 028.


Appellant/
Org. Accused
Versus
1. State of Maharashtra,
2. Vijaykumar Ramchandra Walavalkar,
Having address at : Building No.14,
Flat No.1202, 12th Floor, Near Bhusa
Company, Prabhadevi, Mumbai ­ 400 025.

Respondents/
Respondent No.2­Org. Complainant
Appearance :
Mr. Anthony Michael, Ld. Adv. for appellant.
Mr. Kishor Tadavi, Ld. Addl. P.P. for respondent No.1/State.
Ms. Vaishali Chavan, Ld. Adv. for respondent No.2.
CORAM : HIS HONOUR ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE
K. P. SHRIKHANDE. (C. R. No.87)
DATED : 19th April, 2024.
ORDER
This bail application is filed by the appellant/accused on the
background that he has been convicted by the learned trial Court in
C.C.

No.0602115/SC/2022
by
its
judgment
and
order
dated
05/01/2024 for the offence punishable under section 138 of the
­2­
Negotiable
Instruments
Act
and
BA 377/24 in CA 95/24
sentenced
to
suffer
Simple
Imprisonment for one year. The appellant/accused is also directed to
pay to the complainant compensation to the tune of Rs.7,00,000/­, and
in default, he shall undergo Simple Imprisonment for three months.
2.

Heard the learned advocate for the appellant and the
learned advocate for the respondent No.2. As the appellant/accused
was on bail during the period of trial, and as the appellant/accused has
challenged the legality and propriety of the judgment of conviction by
filing the appeal, and considering the same, as the substantive sentence
of imprisonment and direction to pay compensation have been
suspended, I am of the view that the appellant/accused can be released
on bail. In the result, I proceed to pass the following order :­
ORDER
1.

Criminal Bail Application No.377 of 2024 is allowed.

2.

The appellant/accused Sudhakar Vitthal Narvekar shall be
released on bail on executing the P.R. bond of Rs.25,000/­ with
surety in the like amount.

3.

The appellant/accused to furnish bail before the trial Court
within one month.

4.

Liberty is given to the appellant/accused to furnish the cash
security in lieu of solvent surety.

5.

Criminal Bail Application No.377 of 2024 is disposed of
accordingly.

Date : 19/04/2024.

Typed on
Signed on
( K. P. SHRIKHANDE )
Additional Sessions Judge,
Gr. Mumbai, C.R. No.87 at Mazgaon.

: 25/04/2024.
:
­3­
BA 377/24 in CA 95/24
“CERTIFIED TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE
ORIGINAL SIGNED JUDGMENT/ORDER.”
Upload Date
Upload Time
Bahushruta Y. Jambhale
30/04/2024
11.15 a.m.

Name of Stenographer
Name of the Judge (With C.R. No.)
Date
of
Pronouncement
JUDGEMENT / ORDER
HHJ SHRI K. P. SHRIKHANDE
(COURT ROOM No.87)
of
19/04/2024
JUDGEMENT / ORDER signed by P.O.
on
29/04/2024
JUDGEMENT / ORDER uploaded on
30/04/2024