Rajmohamad Raja Kasam Qureshi Vs State of Maharashtra Bombay Sessions Court Criminal Bail Application No 674 of 2024

MHCC020044992024
IN THE COURT OF SESSIONS FOR GREATER MUMBAI,
AT MAZGAON
CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO.674 OF 2024
IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.184 OF 2024
Rajmohamad @ Raja Kasam Qureshi,
Age : 34 years, Indian Inhabitant,
Occ. : Delivery Boy,
Residing at : Room No.88, Simla Nagar
Rahiwashi Sangh, Nepean Sea Road,
Malbar Hill, Mumbai – 06.


Applicant/
Org. Accused
Versus
The State of Maharashtra,
(Malbar Hill police
station C.R. No.135/2020).


Respondent/
Org. Complainant
Appearance :
Mr. Deepak Dere, Ld. Adv. for applicant.
Mr. Kishor Tadavi, Ld. Addl. P.P. for respondent/State.
CORAM : HIS HONOUR ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE
K. P. SHRIKHANDE. (C. R. No.87)
DATED : 18th March, 2024.
ORDER
This
bail
application
is
filed
on
the
background
that
the
appellant/accused has been convicted by the learned trial Court by its
judgment and order dated 26/02/2024.

The appellant/accused has
been convicted for the offence punishable under sections 354 and
­2­
BA 674/24 in CA 184/24
354(A) of the Indian Penal Code. For the offence punishable under
section 354 of the IPC, the accused is sentenced to suffer Rigorous
Imprisonment for two years and directed to pay fine of Rs.1,000/­, and
in default of payment of fine, he shall suffer Simple Imprisonment for
15 days. For the offence punishable under section 354(A) of the IPC, he
is sentenced to suffer Rigorous Imprisonment for six months and
directed to pay fine of Rs.500/­, and in default of payment of fine, he
shall suffer Simple Imprisonment for 8 days.
2.

The learned A.P.P. has opposed the application by
submitting that the offence is serious and there is possibility of
absconding of the appellant. However, as the appellant/accused was on
bail during the period of trial and as the appellant/accused has
challenged the legality and propriety of the judgment of conviction and
the sentence imposed by filing the appeal, and considering the same, as
the substantive sentence has been suspended, I am of the view that the
appellant/accused can be released on bail. In the result, I proceed to
pass the following order :­
ORDER
1.

Criminal Bail Application No.674 of 2024 is allowed.

2.

The appellant/accused Rajmohamad @ Raja Kasam Qureshi shall
be released on bail on executing the P.R. bond of Rs.20,000/­
with surety in the like amount.

3.

The appellant/accused to furnish bail before the trial Court
within one month.

4.

Liberty
is
given
to
the
appellant/accused
provisional cash bail for one month.

to
furnish
­3­
5.

BA 674/24 in CA 184/24
Criminal Bail Application No.674 of 2024 is disposed of
accordingly.

Date : 18/03/2024.

Typed on
Signed on
( K. P. SHRIKHANDE )
Additional Sessions Judge,
Gr. Mumbai, C.R. No.87 at Mazgaon.

: 21/03/2024.
:
“CERTIFIED TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE
ORIGINAL SIGNED JUDGMENT/ORDER.”
Upload Date
Upload Time
Bahushruta Y. Jambhale
22/03/2024
5.10 p.m.

Name of Stenographer
Name of the Judge (With C.R. No.)
Date
of
Pronouncement
JUDGEMENT / ORDER
HHJ SHRI K. P. SHRIKHANDE
(COURT ROOM No.87)
of
18/03/2024
JUDGEMENT / ORDER signed by P.O.
on
22/03/2024
JUDGEMENT / ORDER uploaded on
22/03/2024