Mohd Munna Rubab Sayyed and Anr Vs State of Maharashtra Bail Application Bombay Sessions Court BA No 218 of 2022

B.A.218/2022
..1..

Order
IN THE COURT OF SESSIONS FOR GREATER BOMBAY AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 218 OF 2022
( CNR NO.: MHCC02­001069­2022 )
1. Mohd. @ Munna Rubab Sayyed
Age: 23 years, Occ: Nil.
R/o: Dr. Zakir Hussain Nagar,
Near Imamwada Hanuman
Mandir, Govandi,
Mumbai­400043.
2. Yasmin Shahbaz Sayyed
Age: 30 years, Occ: Housewife
R/o: Dr. Zakir Hussain Nagar,
Ghatkopar Mankhurd Link Road,
Near Hanuman Temple, Govandi,
Mumbai­400043.

…Applicants/Accused.

V/s.
The State of Maharashtra.
( At the instance of Deonar P.Stn.
Vide C.R. No.9/2022)
…Respondents/State.

Appearance:­
Mr. R.G. Gadgil Advocate for the Applicants/Accused.
Mr. Ramesh Siroya, APP for the State/respondent.

CORAM : H.H. THE ADDL. JUDGE
SHRI G.B.Gurao (C.R.17)
DATE : 16/02/2022.
ORDER
1.

This is an application under section 439 of Cr.P.C. for bail by
B.A.218/2022
..2..

Order
applicants/accused in crime No.9/2022 under section 307,386,387,
143,144,148,149, of IPC and section 3,4,25 & 27 of Arms Act r/w
section 37(1) (a),135 of Maharashtra Police Act, registered at police
station Deonar, Mumbai.
2.

Mr.R.G. Gadgil Advocate for applicants/accused has submitted
that applicants are innocent and they have not committed any crime. No
specific role is assigned to the applicants. The injured was treated as an
OPD patient. Applicants are permanent residents of Mumbai and
undertakes to abide by the conditions, if any, imposed by the Court.
Hence, he prayed to release the applicants/accused on bail.
3.

Mr. Ramesh Siroya, APP for the State has submitted that offence
is serious. Investigation is in progress. And if the accused are released
on bail then they will pressurize the witnesses. He prayed to reject the
application.
4.

I have Perused the FIR and say of prosecution. It is alleged that
present accused and co­accused forcibly recovered “Hafta” from the
shop owners in the area. Complainant’s father runs shop in the said
area and accused had recovered Hafta from him. It is also alleged that
due to harassment by accused complainant’s brother closed his newly
opened washing center. The incident occurred on 4/1/2022 and
5/1/2022. It reveals that accused were armed with revolver, sword
etc… Accused Saddam made two rounds of firing. Accused were also
threatening to other peoples.

Accused also caused injury to the
complainant and his father. Thus, offence is serious investigation is in
progress. Hence, at this juncture, if the accused are released on bail
B.A.218/2022
..3..

Order
then they will pressurize the complainant and witnesses.

Hence,
applicants/ accused are not entitled for bail. Therefore, following order.

ORDER
BA No.218/2022 is rejected and stands disposed of
accordingly.

Digitally signed
by GIRISH
BALKRISHNA
GIRISH
BALKRISHNA GURAO
Date:
GURAO
2022.02.18
13:14:43 +0530
(G.B.Gurao)
Addl. Judge
City Civil & Sessions Court,
Gr. Bombay.
Dictated on
Transcribed on
Date of sign
: 16.02.2022.
: 17.02.2022.
: 18.02.2022.

B.A.218/2022
..4..

Order
CERTIFIED TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL SIGNED
JUDGMENT/ORDER”
18.02.2022.
UPLOAD DATE AND TIME
Mrs. S.S.Sawant
NAME OF STENOGRAPHER
Name of the Judge (with Court Room
No.)

HHJ SHRI.G.B.Gurao,(C.R.No.11)
Addl. Judge.,City Civil & Sessions Court,
Date of pronouncement of /Order
17.02.2022.

Order signed by P.O. on
18.02.2022.

order uploaded on
18.02.2022.