1
IN THE COURT OF SESSIONS FOR GREATER MUMBAI AT
MUMBAI
CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO.1046 OF 2022
CNR NO. MHCC02-005857-2022
1. Arman Ijhar Ahmad
Age : 56 years, Occ.: Business,
R/at : Sangam Nagar, S.M. Road,
Antop Hill, Wadala (E), Mumbai.
2. Gufran Ali Arman Ali Khan
Age : 23 years, Occ.: Business,
R/at : Sangam Nagar, S.M. Road,
Antop Hill, Wadala (E), Mumbai.

…Applicants/Accused
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra
(At the instance of Wadala T.T. Pol.
Stn.)

…Respondent/State
Appearances :Mr. Shaikh Abdul Azim Mohd. Hanif, Ld. Advocate for the
Applicants/Accused.
Ms. Ratnavali Patil, Ld. APP for the Respondent/State.
CORAM : H. H. THE ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE,
SHRI A.A. KULKARNI (C.R.
NO.24)
DATED : 6TH JUNE, 2022
(ORAL ORDER)
Dictated and pronounced in the open Court)
This is an application for bail under Section 439 of
Cr. P.C. Heard Ld. Advocate for the applicant and Ld. APP for
the State. Perused documents on record.

2
2.

The Ld. Advocate for the applicant submitted that
on the information of informant Siraj Ahemad Shaikh Crime
No.231/2022
is
registered
against
the
applicants
on
25.04.2022 for the offence punishable under Sections 504,
323, 324, 326, 34 of IPC. It is his further submission that
though offence under Section 326 of IPC is registered against
the applicants, prima facie no grievous hurt is caused to the
informant. He further submitted that incident suddenly
occurred due to dispute of place of business. In view of
medical papers on record, informant is discharged from the
hospital. Hence, in such circumstances, there is no need for
further detention of applicant. Hence, he prayed for grant of
bail.
3.

Ld. APP filed say Exh.2 and opposed the application
on the ground that informant and applicants are relatives and
there is possibility of tampering of witnesses if the applicants
are released on bail. Hence, prayed for rejection of the
application. Ld. APP also admitted that there is no grievous
hurt caused to the informant as required to offence punishable
under Section 326 of IPC.
4.

In view of submissions from both the sides and on
perusal of medical papers, it is clear that there is no grievous
hurt caused to informant. Offence is occurred due to sudden
fight between parties. Parties are acquainted with each other.
Material investigation is completed. Trial will take its own time.
Hence, in this situation, in my opinion, detention of applicant
for indefinite period cannot be warranted.
following order :-
Hence, the
3
ORDER
1.

Criminal Bail Application No. 1046 of 2022 is allowed.

2.

Applicants/accused No.1 Arman Ijhar Ahmad and No.2
Gufran Ali Arman Ali Khan be released on bail on
furnishing P.R. Bond of Rs.15,000/- along one surety of
like amount each in connection with C.R. No.231/2022
registered with Wadala T.T. Police Station for the offences
punishable under Sections 504, 323, 324, 326, 34 of IPC.

3.

Applicants/accused
shall
attend
Wadala
T.T.

police
station on notice by Investigating Officer.
4.

Applicants/accused shall furnish their residential address
proof and contact numbers to Investigating Officer.

5.

The applicants/accused shall not directly or indirectly,
make any inducement, threat or promise to any person
acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade
him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any
Police Officer.

6.

Applicants/accused shall not leave India without the
previous permission of the Court.

7.

Bail before Ld. Court below.

8.

Criminal
disposed of
Bail
Application
No.1046
of
2022
stands
accordingly.

Date : 6.06.2022
JUDGE
Dictated on : 6.06.2022
Transcribed on
: 6.06.2022
HHJ signed on : 6.06.2022
[A.A. KULKARNI]
ADDITIONAL SESSIONS
GREATER MUMBAI
4
“CERTIFIED TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE
ORIGINAL SIGNED JUDGMENT/ORDER.”
Upload
Date
Upload
Time
6.06.2022 4.30 p.m.

Name of Stenographer
PRAJWALA V. PHODKAR
Name of the Judge (With HHJ SHRI. A.A. KULKARNI (CR
Court Room No.)
24)
Date of Pronouncement 6.06.2022
of JUDGMENT /ORDER
JUDGMENT
/ORDER 6.06.2022
signed by P.O. on
JUDGMENT
uploaded on
/ORDER 6.06.2022